Galaxy X Class

Mark

sparkz88

Galaxy X Class

June 12 2010
I was having a look through the forums and came across this...

(Invalid video video code)

It looks, awesome, overpowered and I really don't want to come across one in PVP! :)
Edited June 12 2010 by nicholasjohn16

Re: Galaxy X Class

June 12 2010
wow, that's intense. i'd love to get my hands on one of those.
Pete Spreadborough

Pete_jhS

Re:Galaxy X Class

June 12 2010
Ouch! That certainly looks powerful. Would like to see a little more of her flying about though; from that clip, the Galaxy X looks pretty ugly to me. :(
Joshua Herman

MizuMaxwell

Re:Galaxy X Class

June 13 2010
Wow that was cool!
Talk about if it got in to the wrong hands.
I think that's why that Fraze was in created, but I want one, I want one. lol
Chris

Propecius

Re:Galaxy X Class

June 14 2010
OK, Galaxy X class vs. Death Star. Discuss! :-)
Jordan - INVAD3R J

INVAD3RJ

Re:Galaxy X Class

June 14 2010
just a few little bits i picked up in the forum, it looks fugly now because the new Galaxy model base isn't on the test server yet, but i saw the screenies and it looks AMAZING!!! And apparently it's been classified as a dreadnaught instead of a cruiser w/e the hell that means. Also, if anyone knows what BO slots this thing has I would love to know.

Galaxy X > Death Star..........they don't have the Riker maneuver ;)
Edited June 14 2010 by INVAD3RJ

Re:Galaxy X Class

June 14 2010
Looks like its that same as the Assualt Cruiser.

Ensign Tac
Lieutenant Tac
Commander Eng
Lt. Commander Eng
Lieutenant Sci
Jordan - INVAD3R J

INVAD3RJ

Re:Galaxy X Class

June 14 2010
Edited June 14 2010 by INVAD3RJ
Chris

Propecius

Re:Galaxy X Class

June 15 2010
NicholasJohn16 wrote:
Looks like its that same as the Assualt Cruiser.

Ensign Tac
Lieutenant Tac
Commander Eng
Lt. Commander Eng
Lieutenant Sci


Actually I heard from a reliable source that it also has one bonus BOFF station, occupied by a retired admiral with irumodic syndrome. But his only attack is being mildly grumpy, which deals slightly less damage than the average tribble bite.

(I'm lying. I don't have any reliable sources. I just wanted to be cool.)
Alex

A1088

Re:Galaxy X Class

June 16 2010
She's a beauty, I was excited to see her on the TNG series finale, and I'm excited to see her in STO. I have faced one in PVP but luckily I didn't get the phaser cannon.
Wolf

AmericanWolf

Re:Galaxy X Class

June 16 2010
This is one impressive fighting machine alright! I would love to have one fighting on my side.
X Centric

Xcentric

Re: Galaxy X Class

July 09 2010
Well, the power to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of the Force, but regardless that is one sexy beast. I'll take two, please.
Joseph Baker

Jerran

Re: Galaxy X Class

July 09 2010
I bought one last weekend and tried it out. It was fun. The ability to use cannons is nice and that big phaser is a good touch, though it takes over two minutes to recharge. The cloaking device is an interesting addition as well. With no more Romulus I guess the treaty of algeron no longer applies
Noel Vega

Sincarino

Re: Galaxy X Class

July 10 2010
Jerran wrote:
The cloaking device is an interesting addition as well. With no more Romulus I guess the treaty of algeron no longer applies


Was disappointed that my tier 4 escort (Defiant class) didn't have a cloaking device! But good point Jerran! /endQQ
Kidd Kasper

kiddkasper

Re: Galaxy X Class

July 10 2010
Sincarino wrote:
Jerran wrote:
The cloaking device is an interesting addition as well. With no more Romulus I guess the treaty of algeron no longer applies


Was disappointed that my tier 4 escort (Defiant class) didn't have a cloaking device! But good point Jerran! /endQQ



SPOILER!!!!!!

Defiant cloaking (as a retro fit) is coming in Season 2.0 ;)
Edited July 10 2010 by kiddkasper
Noel Vega

Sincarino

Re: Galaxy X Class

July 10 2010
kiddkasper wrote:
SPOILER!!!!!!

Defiant cloaking (as a retro fit) is coming in Season 2.0 ;)


woot!!! :D
Joseph Baker

Jerran

Re: Galaxy X Class

July 10 2010
Sincarino wrote:
Jerran wrote:
The cloaking device is an interesting addition as well. With no more Romulus I guess the treaty of algeron no longer applies


Was disappointed that my tier 4 escort (Defiant class) didn't have a cloaking device! But good point Jerran! /endQQ


Yeah, I agree. I never bought the whole thing about how Fed ships didn't have cloaking devices cause they had better sensors and didn't need them. They still serve a tactical position.
Andrew Isaacs-Smith

Khyfa

Re: Galaxy X Class

July 10 2010
**SPOILER** The Galaxy X is only good in the hands of Brandon Felczer. Everyone else sucks....Bwahahah
Brandon Felczer

CapnBranFlakes

Re: Galaxy X Class

July 10 2010
Khyfa wrote:
**SPOILER** The Galaxy X is only good in the hands of Brandon Felczer. Everyone else sucks....Bwahahah


O_o